Please report broken hyperlinks using the Reply option at the bottom of each page.
“Its purpose primarily is to try and convince the world… that there is a literal truth to the Bible, and that includes the literal truth of a story of [a Garden of Eden].”
Does Genesis 1 Conflict with Science?
Were Adam and Eve ‘Cavemen?’
[ASND thinks the question is a perfectly reasonable and fair one. ASND also thinks, however, that much of what the article offered as “evidence” was neither. And none of it was scientific.]
[Readers interested in examining what ASND considers to be a broad spectrum of reasonable, fair, scientific and biblical evidence for the “personhood” of Adam and Eve are invited to spend some time studying the following resources.]
“…genetic material from Neanderthals still can be found in a piece of DNA (called a haplotype) in the human X chromosome — meaning [humans and neanderthals] clearly mated.”
[There are only “two sides” of the Ape Man “debate” ? (See page 4 of that last linked document.) And “both” of those sides are simultaneously true? How can that be when “one” side (the same side which built the museum described above) claims that Neanderthals were actually human beings and the “other” side cites evidence proving that claim to have been scientifically falsified ? (See page 7 in that last linked document.) ]
[ Nobody Important is so confused.]
Don’t Genesis 1 and 2 present contradictory creation accounts?