Please report broken hyperlinks using the Reply option at the bottom of each page.
[For those who don’t know, CoViD-19 is not the name of a virus, it is the name of a coronavirus-caused disease (much the same as AIDS is not the name of a virus, it is the name of a disease — supposedly (but not actually ) — caused by a virus, HIV).]
Emails show scientists scrubbed early warning of potential lab origin of COVID-19
“[T]he preponderance of the increase in [CoViD-19] cases and deaths experienced by [many] countries [after the vast majority of their citizens were fully vaccinated] were among their vaccinated population… How safe are the vaccines? Recently six European countries have suspended or terminated the use of the Moderna vaccine for the younger population (30 and under)… Taiwan has suspended the Pfizer vaccine for younger people… Emergency rooms [across the U.S.] are swamped [as of early November, 2021]… with patients suffering from respiratory conditions, blood clots and heart conditions. Symptoms that are… the most common and underreported serious side-effects of the vaccines… [while] heart inflammation cases [another common vaccine side-effect] have increased [in the U.S.] by 5000% [yes, that’s five THOUSAND percent] in 4 months… [and] Excess deaths [globally] primarily due to respiratory, autoimmune and heart issues (not due to covid) are 20-50% higher for the summer and fall of 2021 as compared to the five-year average in the same calendar period for those countries with a high percentage of the population vaccinated for Covid-19… The CDC has been forced to admit that they do not have on record even one instance of an unvaccinated naturally immune individual transmitting Covid-19 to another individual. Unlike innumerable instances when fully vaccinated people transmit the virus to other people, thus, confirming the superiority of natural immunity. 2) A recent study published by the CDC claiming vaccine immunity is superior has been pilloried by numerous doctors, epidemiologists, and other experts as a sham. Alex Berenson wrote: ‘The CDC study is meaningless gibberish that never would have been published if the agency did not face huge political pressure to get people vaccinated.’ 3) There have been 128 documented and peer reviewed studies affirming the superiority of natural immunity, in contrast to one highly flawed non-peer reviewed CDC study… The CDC on its website claims: ‘Covid vaccines do not create or cause variants of the virus that causes Covid-19.’… [yet] Notable scientists, doctors, and Nobel Prize winners from around the world have assessed and warned that mass vaccination will engender variants from what are leaky mRNA Covid-19 vaccines… [and] A new covid variant identified in a number of highly vaccinated European countries is raising concerns among health professionals because there are changes to the coronavirus spike protein that have never been seen before… What is abundantly clear is that a vaccine that, to begin with, doesn’t stop transmission and gradually wanes is not a vaccine and, in fact, makes the virus learn to grow stronger and more durable… [M]ass vaccination… is now the greatest obstacle to ending this [CoViD-19] pandemic in countries [like the U.S.] that have not achieved herd immunity through prior infection.”
[ASND doesn’t know why that meme didn’t also say that conspiracy theorists “don’t vaccinate“, because they don’t. However, this section of this page explains to people who don’t want to read why that is true.]
“There’s no expert consensus behind many of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s policies. But instead of welcoming open scientific dialogue and inquiry… the CDC ‘dug in early‘ and ‘dismissed‘ any dissenting [vaccination] voices… The ‘sit down and shut up‘ dialogue style only breeds suspicion that the virus’ risks are magnified for political reasons… But the left [who now run the CDC, thanks to Joe Biden] can’t admit vaccine-hesitant people might be rational. In fact, the mainstream media would have you believe all public health dissenters [from the left-dominated CDC party line] are kooks. [But] Kooks aren’t professors at the Johns Hopkins Schools of Medicine… Harvard and Stanford… [one of whom] makes a good case against the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. To justify vaccinating children, the CDC cites 335 COVID-19 deaths in minors [which is a fraction of how many minors die every year from influenza]. The CDC never verified that these deaths were caused by COVID-19… nor has it shown that healthy children are at the same risk as children with, say, leukemia [or the flu]. In a Johns Hopkins study of 48,000 COVID-19-positive children, ‘no healthy kid died of COVID.’ ‘[The CDC is] imposing tremendous restrictions’ on children, but [it] refuses to say what risk COVID-19 poses to healthy children… The CDC also ignores the benefits of ‘natural immunity from prior infection‘… [despite the well-established medical fact that] if you’ve recovered from COVID-19, you probably don’t need the vaccine.”
[Speaking of government school mask mandates…]
New COVID-19 Data Supports Ending School Mask Mandates
At Least 22 States Count ‘Probable’ COVID Cases in Totals
New Jersey Added Nearly 2,000 ‘Probable’ Coronavirus Deaths To Official Count
[Under the direction of a liberal Democrat governor. No surprise.]
Florida department of health exposed for massively inflating COVID-19 positivity rate
There are significant discrepancies in America’s COVID-19 “hotspot”
Florida labs not reporting negative test results, report says
[Florida’s public health officials — like those in virtually every state — are closet leftist activists concealing a political agenda against their Republican governor boss.]
Texas Revises Coronavirus Numbers Down, Removes 3,484 ‘Probable’ Cases
[Yes, that was three THOUSAND fraudulently reported CoViD-19 cases — just in Texas. And yes, just like in Florida, the liberal Texas public health officials were intentionally falsifying CoViD case data to impugn their Republican governor boss.]
600,000 ‘Mistakenly’ Told They’ve Had Covid
[Yes, you read that correctly. There were SIX HUNDRED THOUSAND Americans at one point in July, 2020 who were falsely “reported” as CoViD-19 cases. And liberals still believe this was an accident and that it hasn’t been repeated.]
Ohio Gov. DeWine tests negative for COVID-19 mere hours after testing positive
[The likelihood of thousands, perhaps tens of thousands of similar false positives is unquestionably high.]
Connecticut State Lab Finds 90 False Positives Out Of 144 Coronavirus Tests Administered
[But all of those “cases” were originally reported as positives.]
COVID spikes likely the result of bogus tests
“Widespread inconsistencies and convolution among data and laboratory tracking appears to be significantly contributing to possible misinformation provided to the public. From nearly the outset of the virus, the Council of State and Territorial Epidemiologists gave massive latitude to public health officials in the criteria for identifying COVID-19 cases. The guidelines gave extensive license in qualifying people as ‘probable‘ positive for SARS-CoV-2, without them being required to undergo laboratory testing for the virus… [T]he data from [both active virus and antibody] tests should be differentiated [in official CoViD-19 “case” reports], but until recently, this was still not being widely done. A May  expose by The Atlantic revealed that the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmed a consistent differentiation was not being made between these two independent tests, with the ‘positive‘ results being aggregated and reported back to state officials as homogenous totals. The lack of uniformity in consolidating [these] data calls into question the [summer, 2020] uptick in ‘positive‘ tests and its potential effects in skewing the numbers and misinforming the public. Inconsistently combining testing data [has led several state] government[s] to impose unwarranted restrictions and mandates, potentially leading to irreparable and long-term damage to small businesses across the nation. This could create undue economic and psychological stress to families, and influence civic engagement in a politically volatile election year.”
“Discussing case counts in covid without reference to [vastly increased U.S.] testing levels is tantamount to lying. It ignores sampling rate. Test any given population twice as much and you [inevitably] find twice as many cases.”
CDC: Study of antibody tests show [U.S. SARS-CoV-2] virus [infection] rates 10 times higher than reported
“[I]t is likely that greater than 10 times more SARS-CoV-2 infections occurred than the number of reported COVID-19 cases…”
NYT Fudges Data To Claim Huge Spike In COVID-19 Hospitalizations
“[T]he article’s own source reveals [late in the article, where very few people read] that the spike in numbers can be partly attributed to the fact that Florida, the country’s third-most-populous state, began reporting hospitalizations only two weeks ago [in early July, 2020]… A deeper dive into the data reveals Florida wasn’t the only addition to hospitalization counts. On April 15, a total of [only] 37 states and territories were included in the near-60,000 hospitalization figure, with New York bearing the brunt of the caseload. July’s so-called spike includes data from 52 states and territories.”
“A percentage is a ratio, numerator divided by denominator. The [oft-reported — by the mainstream, left wing media] 3.5 percent [CoViD-19 mortality rate] is calculated as… ‘total deaths’ divided by… ‘total cases.’ However, total cases include only those tested [for the SARS-CoV-2 virus], and tests are offered only to those who are symptomatic… [But] A [published, peer-reviewed] population study… of healthy volunteers suggested that the actual [CoViD-19] case rate may be 50-85 times greater than the reported total [CoViD-19] cases. Using [these empirically determined, scientific numbers in the aforementioned mortality calculation], the death risk for the general population [from CoViD-19] becomes [only] 0.07 percent, that is, seven out of 10,000 healthy Americans will die with COVID infection, just like the flu… [Therefore] the risk of death due to COVID-19 infection has been [intentionally and fraudulently] inflated to resemble Ebola or bubonic plague when in fact, the [actual, factual] health risk is closer to the seasonal flu… Based on the official false narrative, states have shut down their economies, and the country has suppressed the development of national herd immunity.”
—Deane Waldman, MD, MBA; Emeritus Professor of Pediatric, Pathology, and Decision Science; former Director of Center for Healthcare Policy at Texas Public Policy Foundation
“Consider the following summary of all of the relevant research to date that’s been conducted by distinguished immunologists, virologists, epidemiologists, and other medical specialists from around the world:
(1) As Big Media continues to keep the scare going by reporting upon alleged increases in COVID cases, given the partisan prejudices of the vast majority of ‘journalists,’ it is unsurprising that it fails to note that these alleged increases are accompanied by a diminishing mortality rate. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) itself just last week estimated that the actual rate of infection in America is anywhere between six to 24 times the number of confirmed cases. Covidtracking.com informs us that, at present, there are 4.1 million confirmed cases in the United States and 137,655 COVID deaths. Therefore, by the CDC’s own reckoning, there are anywhere between approximately 24 million and 98 million COVID cases. And, thus, the mortality rate of COVID is anywhere between .0056 and .0014. What this in turn means is that of those who contract the Virus, 99.44% – 99.86% survive. At the very most, the overall lethality rate (IFR) of the Virus is .1%. One-tenth of one percent. The lethality rate of the [SARS-CoV-2] Virus is [therefore no greater than] that of the seasonal flu… Even in COVID ‘hotspots,’ the risk of death for those members of the general population who are of school and working ages is the same as that of a daily commute to one’s work.
(2) As for the allegedly ‘alarming increase in case numbers’ of COVID [during the summer of 2020] over which Big Media hasn’t been able to stop fear mongering as of late, it wouldn’t take much for a mildly curious person to see what’s actually going on. It is wholly unsurprising that those states that began reopening first are those that are witnessing rising case numbers, for given that its residents were returning to work and school, more testing for COVID has been taking place. And this means that, in absolute terms, more people have been testing positive for COVID. However, this doesn’t mean anything at all like what the Fake News media is trying to convince Americans it means. For starters, a positive test doesn’t necessarily mean that the person who so tested is sick or even infected. A test can come back positive due to non-infectious viral fragments, asymptomatic infection, a repeated test, or a false-positive test (for there has always been a high rate of false positives for the PCR test). The rate of positive testing has remained stable. Beyond this, given that antibody and immunological testing has shown that the Virus is as much as 50 times more widespread than PCR testing would lead us to believe, ‘case numbers’ is a wildly inaccurate benchmark for determining whether or not we are in a public health crisis. To accomplish the latter, it is to the numbers of those who are ill, hospitalized, and dying that we need to turn. And when we turn to these criteria what we discover is that more people are not getting sick, hospitals and Intensive Care Units are functioning as they were in the pre-COVID era, and fewer people are dying.
(3) As much as 80%, or four out of five, of all people who test positive for COVID have zero symptoms. Even those most at risk, the elderly, when they are between the ages of 70 and 79, are asymptomatic about 60% of the time! A whopping 95% of all who test positive for this second iteration of the Black Plague develop, at the most, mild symptoms.
(4) The average age of those who seem to have died from COVID is about 80, and even of these, some 96% had multiple preexisting conditions. In other words, given their age and health, the mortality rate from this virus is essentially that of other viruses and infections.
(5) It is estimated that perhaps as many as three out of every five people (60%) have developed a cellular background immunity to this coronavirus by virtue of having been exposed in the past to other corona, or common cold, viruses. The belief that no one had any immunity to COVID-19 because of its novelty has since been disproven.
(6) The official number of Virus deaths that Big Media trumpets is surely, wildly, inaccurate. Hospitals administrators, which stand to gain financially from identifying patients as COVID patients, have ordered doctors to list as death from COVID any and all who it is believed may have died with COVID.”
[That point (6) is supported by multiple lines of evidence in the following section.]
Johns Hopkins Study Saying COVID-19 Has ‘Relatively No Effect on Deaths‘ in U.S. Spiked After Publication
“[Johns Hopkins University] did not challenge the accuracy of the [the study’s] data or its conclusions. In other words, the article was deleted because it didn’t fit the proper narrative
“[A] new study… published by Dr. Genevieve Briand at Johns Hopkins University notes some critical accounting errors done at the national level. The study – which is still being vetted – simply examines the raw data that should have been questioned months ago. The overall conclusion is that Covid-19, at least according to collected data, is not the killer disease that it is currently hyped up to be.”
“[W]e know that 51% of Hoosier fatalities were over 80 years old and that 94% of them had at least one serious comorbidity that may actually have caused death. 91% of all COVID-19 deaths [in Indiana] were over 60 years, and they too had a 94% probability of at least one comorbidity. In other words, [all] 80-year old[s in Indiana] who died of cancer but had COVID-19 at autopsy, technically died of COVID-19 for Indiana’s tracking purposes… The State Health Department does not conduct this practice for other diseases. That is, you don’t die of the flu if you are in a motorcycle crash and happen to cough before dying. The top comorbidities in Indiana are Hypertension (high blood pressure), Diabetes, Chronic Pulmonary Obstructive Disease, renal (kidney) issues, and Congestive Heart Failure. Any one of these comorbidities could have been the actual cause of death in people classified as COVID-19 deaths… What makes this worse is that the top comorbidities are virtually all self-inflicted or, at least, mostly preventable! If we counted all the deaths that were attributed to or had complications from diabetes the way we count COVID-19 fatalities, that number would be greater than 270,000 Americans every year.
The major root causes of co-morbidity cases in the US are overeating, poor food choices, and smoking… This [blatant fraud has] severely warp[ed] the [CoViD-19 mortality] data [in many — perhaps most — U.S. states]… Knowing the flaws in data collection means that the IFR rate is even lower than that.26% number. Due to COVID-19’s politicization and the confusing information put out since the initial outbreak, many people who know better are not willing to stand up publicly and say so for fear of repercussions. I have personally talked with doctors treating COVID-19 patients and infectious disease experts who have validated the above analysis, but who do not want to go on the record, fearing personal and professional persecution.”
[BTW, the CoViD-19 mortality fraud has a cause and an origin: The U.S. CDC.]
CDC Tells Hospitals To List COVID as Cause of Death Even if You’re Just Assuming or It Only Contributed
“Dr. Scott Jensen, a Minnesota family physician, received a 7-page document from the CDC [linked in the article] coaching him to fill out death certificates with a COVID-19 diagnosis without a lab test to confirm the patient actually had the virus. There is a big difference between people dying with the virus and people dying from the virus, but the CDC is coaching doctors to officially ignore that difference.”
Dr. Scott Jensen blasts ‘ridiculous‘ CDC coronavirus death count guidelines
“Jensen [said] the CDC’s death certificate manual tells physicians to focus on ‘precision and specificity,’ but the coronavirus death certification guidance ‘runs completely counter to that axiom… ‘ The idea that we are going to allow people to massage and sort of game the numbers is a real issue because we are going to undermine the [public] trust, ‘ he said. Jensen gave a hypothetical example of a patient who died while suffering from influenza. If the patient was elderly and had symptoms like fever and cough a few days before passing away, the doctor explained, he would have listed ‘respiratory arrest‘ as the primary cause of death… ‘I might well put emphysema or congestive heart failure, but I would never put influenza down as the underlying cause of death and yet that’s what we are being asked to do here‘… Jensen then [said] that under the CDC guidelines, a patient who died after being hit by a bus and tested positive for coronavirus would be listed as having presumed to have died from the virus regardless of whatever damage was caused by the bus. ‘That doesn’t make any sense,‘ he said.“
“During a task force meeting [last] Wednesday, a heated discussion broke out between Deborah Birx, the physician who oversees the administration’s coronavirus response, and Robert Redfield, the director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Birx and others were frustrated with the CDC’s antiquated system for tracking virus data, which they worried was inflating some statistics — such as mortality rate and case count — by as much as 25 percent… According to two of the sources, Birx exclaimed, ‘There is nothing from the CDC that I can trust.‘“
CDC director acknowledges hospitals have a monetary incentive to overcount coronavirus deaths
CDC data on Coronavirus deaths exaggerating the number of deaths?: US Hospitals Paid More for labeling cause of death as Coronavirus, Doctors falsely labeling deaths
“In New York City [the USA’s originally highest death-rate area for CoViD-19], the death of anyone who dies who tests positive for COVID-19 is counted as a coronavirus death. This is the case even if the coronavirus failed to play a significant role in the person’s passing or illness. This calculus violates established scientific standards.“
NYC’s Coronavirus Death Toll Is Being Intentionally & Fraudulently Inflated
Here is the video evidence confirming that fact.
Texas Downgrades COVID Death Toll After ‘Error’ Wrongly Attributes Hundreds Of Deaths To COVID
[They got busted.]
At Least 22 States Count ‘Probable’ COVID Deaths in Totals
[And with states like New York — which leads, by far, all states in reported CoViD-19 deaths — involved in the mortality fraud, the percentage of fraudulent deaths is unavoidably high. We just don’t know — and like won’t ever know — exactly how high since no one in New York is ever going to order cadavers be exhumed from graves to perform autopsies (which likely wouldn’t be accurate or possible anyway).]
“[E]ven if you died of [a] clear alternative cause, but you had COVID at the same time, it’s still listed as a COVID death.”
“Anyone testing positive at the time of death is counted as a COVID death, from alcohol poisoning or a shooting, to someone in hospice with weeks to live, dying from their underlying condition, but testing positive. George Floyd is likely somewhere in the COVID death count as he tested positive at autopsy.”
[BTW, the CoViD-19 mortality fraud is hardly limited to the United States.]
“Dr. Birx… [said] ‘There are other countries [besides the U.S.] that if you had a pre-existing condition, and let’s say the [corona]virus caused you to go to the ICU [intensive care unit] and then have a heart or kidney problem… [those countries] are recording that [death] as a heart issue or a kidney issue and not a COVID-19 death ‘… [But] There’s a [glaring, medically relevant] difference between someone dying of COVID-19 and someone dying with COVID-19. Typically, an autopsy would be performed to determine the actual cause of death. This [autopsy] is very important in determining the real fatality rate of the virus [which is the only meaningful statistic which policymakers should be using to make coronavirus response policies].
“[T]esting [coronavirus] penetration [into] populations varies by country, [but] everywhere [it] is heavily weighted to the very sick, missing completely the possibly huge number of [coronavirus] positives who are only slightly ill or have no symptoms at all. A death rate based [only] on that numerator is grossly misleading in an alarmist direction… Potentially further calling into question the value of the published numbers is that there are apparently no international standards for when a death should be attributed to the Wuhan virus. In Germany, it appears that they are strict — i.e., death must have been caused by the [corona]viral flu, not the underlying condition that put the usually elderly person at high risk. To some extent, at least, this may account for Germany’s extraordinarily low death rate, even employing its known cases as numerator. Italy, on the other hand, may be inadvertently inflating its death numbers by including virtually all deaths in Wuhan-positive persons in their total, regardless of apparent actual cause. There is some evidence that Italy performs postmortem Wuhan tests, and if the body tests positive, the death is attributed to the virus — though, in fact, the (e.g.) 87-year-old who had been suffering from heart failure for months was carried off by his underlying, largely age-related frailty.“
99% of Those Who Died From Virus Had Other Illness, Italy Says
“The way in which we code [coronavirus] deaths in [Italy erroneously reports that]… all the people who die in hospitals with the coronavirus are deemed to be dying of the coronavirus. [But] On re-evaluation by the National Institute of Health, only 12 per cent of [coronavirus-credited] death certificates have shown a direct causality from coronavirus, while 88 per cent of patients who have died have at least one pre-morbidity – many had two or three [pre-existing, life-threatening health problems].”
[But back to the United States…]
Over half of Minnesota coronavirus death certificates list something else as primary cause of death
[Also no surprise. Minnesota is owned and operated by the Democrat party.]
Multiple Known Deaths Incorrectly Attributed to COVID-19 in Palm Beach County, FL
Autopsy shows Wellington nurse died of kidney infection, not COVID-19
Her death was fraudulently reported as CoViD-caused
“It has been widely reported… that a seven-year-old boy from Chatham County… Georgia died ‘from COVID-19‘… [Those ‘reports‘, however, were all outright lies. In reality] the child [actually] had a seizure and fell in the shower and was unresponsive… [In reality (which is unavailable to liberals), therefore, this was yet] another example of someone dying with the Wuhan virus and not from it.”
Florida Nurse Reported To Have Died of COVID Actually Died of Kidney Infection
Family Says Public Health Officials Are Lying About Oklahoma Grandpa’s ‘COVID’ Death
Florida COVID-19 Death Count Includes Young Man Who Died In Motorcycle Accident, Health Official Confirms
“The person who died did not die from COVID-19 (he died of alcohol poisoning because toxicology showed his blood-alcohol level was 0.55, way past the lethal level of 0.3), but [he] did test positive for the [SARS-VoV-2] virus… [Yet] The state [of Colorado — controlled by Democrats] is reporting that death as a COVID death.”
A 37-year-old man who died from an overdose of fentanyl has been added to the ranks of Ventura County’s [California] COVID-19-related deaths.
22-year-old [Georgia] woman dies COVID-19 positive, coroner says different cause of death
PA coroners, state health dept. [controlled by Democrats] at odds over how to handle suspected coronavirus cases, potentially affecting death count
San Diego Supervisor Says Only 6 Of 194 Coronavirus-Recorded Deaths ‘Pure’ Coronavirus Deaths
“I just can’t stand the fact of people [in the VA state health dept] saying he died from this virus… Yes, he had it and it probably made him weaker, but in my heart, I don’t think that’s what he died of. I think he had a heart attack… I will not just stand by and let his death be another [CoViD-19] statistic.”
’My mother was 91 when she passed,’ the daughter, who requested anonymity, said. ‘She had been in hospice since January. I feel the diagnosis of ‘respiratory failure due to COVID-19’ is not true. To add a death due to the virus just to inflate the numbers is not right.” [That’s because it’s a lie.]
“When Donald VanBuren died at South Peninsula [AK] Hospital, his death was listed as a COVID-19 death. It turns out, the neighbors in Anchor Point knew better: The 90-year-old was dying with a body riddled with cancer and kidney failure. And yet, a test for COVID-19 came back positive, and so COVID-19 it is, at least on his death certificate.”
“[Some] Deaths have been classified as a COVID-19 death even after a physician or loved ones reported otherwise. And those who died ‘with’ COVID-19 have been included in the count with those who died ‘of’ COVID-19… [but since] There’s no uniformity [in mortality reporting, there is no way to know how rampant the fraud has become]. [Fortunately, however…] On Wednesday, a report said President Trump and members of the White House Coronavirus Task Force are pushing the CDC to revise the way it counts coronavirus deaths. That change could lead to far fewer deaths being counted.”
“The wholesale applicability of COVID-19 first began with the expansion of the disease’s symptoms into a DOE, or Disease of Everything that in turn has become the formula for interpreting the entirety of the field of medicine. The long list of symptoms attributed to viral infection have expanded to the status of a universal affliction. Symptoms include COVID toes, blood clots, organ failure and heart attacks, dizziness, difficulty breathing, coughing, sniffles, and much more.”
[BTW, the first of those fraudulent CoViD-19 death citations – from Colorado – was actually addressed and corrected by the Colorado state health department due to the blatant, obvious fraud that was exposed by that article. The Colorado state health department was forced to re-examine their entire CoViD-19 death rate processes and procedures and – not surprisingly – their reported death rate for CoViD-19 plummeted.]
Colorado amends coronavirus death count – says fewer have died of COVID-19 than previously reported
Lies & Data Manipulation: NYC Adds 3,700 Who Never Tested Positive To COVID-19 Death Toll
Drug overdoses, head trauma deaths, many other fraudulently reported mortalities added to coronavirus death tolls around the country.
Pennsylvania Forced To Remove Hundreds Of Deaths From Coronavirus Death Count After Coroners Raise Red Flags
“Pennsylvania has corrected its coronavirus data multiple times over the past week to account for irregularities [a journalistic euphemism for ‘outright fraud‘]… Pennsylvania started to include ‘probable deaths’ in its fatalities [as per the US-CDC’s new, politically motivated, fraud-based mortality reporting guidlines]. As a result, the total number of coronavirus deaths… almost doubl[ed]… in [just] two days… The Pennsylvania Department of Health (DOH) subsequently removed 200 deaths from its count after facing mounting questions about the accuracy of the count [from thinking people who recognized the obvious fraud].”
Funeral Directors Blow the Whistle on Deaths Falsely Attributed to Coronavirus
“Who knows what [CoViD-19 mortality] numbers are real, valid, underreported or overreported anymore [actually, ever]? Different places have different criteria for their counts of not just cases of infected COVID-19 patients, but those who have supposedly died of the virus. Because of these differences, it’s not out of the realm of possibility that we may never know the true scope of this novel coronavirus. We do have one thing that was made very clear by [one state health department official]: ‘[T]echnically even if you died of a clear alternate cause, but you had COVID at the same time, it’s still listed as a COVID death. So, everyone who is listed as a COVID death doesn’t mean that that was the cause of the death, but they had COVID at the time of death.'”
[Despite all this rampant, proven, and admitted nation-wide CoViD-19 mortality fraud, check this out.]
The U.S. CoViD-19 Mortality Rate vs. Europe and Canada
U.S. Beats Them All
Chief Of World-Renowned Lancet Medical Journal Has Repeatedly Bashed US, Praised China For Coronavirus Response
“[O]ur entire research infrastructure is unable to do research in an emergency… everyday [doctors] that had basic research questions about coronavirus transmission and prevention were unable to act on those research questions because of this giant bureaucratic infrastructure dominated by the old guard medical establishment.”
—Martin Makary, MD, MPH, Editor-in-Chief, MedPage Today
“[T]he Journal of the American Medical Association [JAMA] — the flagship medical journal in the United States —published an opinion article defaming [Dr. Scott Atlas] without engaging actual scientific views. The editors of the journal then refused to publish letters supporting Atlas. Contrary to his critics, Atlas got the science right. The highest COVID-19 mortality risk is among nursing home residents. Atlas worked to ensure federal support for frequent and rapid testing of nursing home staff, residents, and visitors. While not implemented everywhere, this initiative alone saved innumerable lives. Atlas worked hard to make masks available in nursing homes. Atlas was right to contradict former Centers for Disease Control director Dr. Robert Redfield’s false assertion that masks are more effective than vaccines. Atlas advocated for in-person schooling during the pandemic, a position that even pro-lockdown epidemiologists now endorse… In two articles published in Scientific American, two esteemed medical journalists presented evidence against the false charges [Dr. John] Ioannidis faced [for] publishing [a peer-reviewed research article] in the ‘Bulletin of the World Health Organization‘ [which] helped establish how deadly the virus actually is — an order of magnitude lower than the conventional [left wing political and mainstream media] narrative implies. Shockingly, these journalists were then attacked [by — of course — the political left wing and the mainstream media]. The publisher [of Ionandis’ peer-reviewed article — Scientific American] caved and published extensive trivial ‘corrections’ to their story, none of which contradicted their reporting… Oxford University professor Sunetra Gupta, who is one of the world’s preeminent infectious disease epidemiologists, has been the subject of vicious attacks by [left wing] politicians and [mainstream] media pundits with a fraction of her knowledge and wisdom. Gupta has argued throughout the epidemic for protecting the vulnerable while allowing the disease to be managed in the rest of society with limited restrictions and minimal harm… Another epidemiologist, Professor Carl Heneghan, who leads the Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine at the University of Oxford, has been the subject of similar abuse. Although he has spent his entire career evaluating and interpreting scientific evidence for scientists and the public, overwrought [and under taught left wing and media] critics have called his writings ‘anti-science’ for daring to point out that the only published randomized study on the efficacy of face masks calls into question their effectiveness against COVID-19 infection… Dr. Jonas Ludvigsson, professor of epidemiology at the prestigious Karolinska Institute in Sweden, published a ground-breaking study in the New England Journal of Medicine making it clear that it is safe to keep schools open during the pandemic, for children and teachers alike. This work has informed the policy of countries worldwide and states like Florida in the United States, which have provided safe, in-person instruction for children despite high community caseloads. For this, Ludvigsson received abuse from both [left wing] Swedish and international scientists and journalists, to the point he is refocusing his scientific work away from COVID-19… What these scientists have in common is that they have been proved right. With so many COVID-19 deaths, it should now be obvious to everyone that lockdown strategies have failed to protect the old. While anyone can get infected, there is more than a thousand-fold difference in the risk of death between the old and the young.”
— Martin Kulldorff, Ph.D., professor of medicine, Harvard University
— Jay Bhattacharya, MD, Ph.D., professor of medicine, Stanford University
“Some of the world’s top scientific journals are being accused of suppressing the results of a [peer-reviewed] study aimed at determining the effectiveness of face masks against the spread of the coronavirus… The journals refusing to publish the results reportedly include the Lancet, the New England Journal of Medicine, and the Journal of the American Medical Association.”
Danish mask study that JAMA, NEJM & Lancet REFUSED to publish was just published in Annals of Internal Medicine.
In the largest randomized controlled trial to date w/ 6,024 subjects, medical masks were NOT effective protection against infection.
As Biden takes office, renowned medical journal The Lancet quietly retracts study claiming HCQ is ineffective
“[T]here is no excuse for peer-reviewed medical journals (such as The New England Journal of Medicine and The Lancet) for publishing ‘research’ in haste… because these studies [which were later retracted due to falsifications] contradicted [Donald Trump’s] narrative [regarding the medically supervised, prescriptive use of hydroxychloroqine to treat early symptoms of CoViD-19].”
“Kan. Dept. of Health & Eniv. Secretary Lee Norman shared a COVID case chart with media which he said showed the counties that abided by Governor Kelly’s mask mandate are ‘winning the battle.’ But he deceptively altered the chart to justify mask mandates.”
[ASND is actually of the opinion that masks offer some limited prophylactic usefulness since the SARS-CoV-2 virus is moisture-borne rather than air-borne (meaning the breath-based moisture particles almost always precipitate out of the ambient air after exhalation, carrying the viruses with them down to surfaces where they don’t continue to exist for very long.). But the science is far from settled on masks so ASND won’t dogmatically jump on either end of the mask argument see saw until it is settled. The above-cited article was included because it reveals yet another “deceptive” fraud perpetrated by health department liberals in their unending pursuit of damning “evidence” to ab-use against Donald Trump.]
Many additional citations will be added to this section in the near future. Feel free to request them ASAP using the Reply option below.