Please report broken hyperlinks using the Reply option at the bottom of each page.

[T]he [2021 U.N.IPCC [report] found… that [it’s own earlier and] most extreme projections for warming — the so-called code red — was downgraded to ‘low likelihood.’


… &

Nowhere does the [2021] IPCC report say that billions of people are at immediate risk…  Instead of apocalyptic warnings about ‘immediate risk’ a top line message of [the 2021] report should be: ‘Great News! The Extreme Scenario that IPCC Saw as Most Likely in 2013 is Now Judged Low Likelihood.“ 


… &

“[The 2021 IPCC report] finds no discernible trends for hurricanes, winter storms, floods, tornadoes or thunderstorms…  Not surprisingly [though], these findings were scarcely mentioned in [mainstream, left wing media] coverage of the report.



U.N. IPCC official Ottmar Edenhofer, speaking in November 2010, advised that, ‘One must free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy.  [What we’re doing at the IPCC] has almost nothing to do with the climate.  We must state clearly that we use climate policy to redistribute de facto the world’s wealth.


[Another quote from the IPCC’s Ottmar Edenhofer…]

Climate policy has almost nothing to do anymore with protecting the environment.  The [2010] world climate summit in Cancun [was] actually an economy summit during which [re]distribution of the world’s resources [were] negotiated.



[T]he IPCC does not hide its belief that capitalism and economic growth threaten the future of the planet.



In 1988, global warming fever was launched when  Dr. James Hansen of NASA , in a congressional hearing room intentionally manipulated to be warm and humid, testified before Congress that ‘the greenhouse effect is here and is affecting our climate now.‘  Two months later, the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) was born, the “child” of two United Nations parent bodies — the UN Environmental Programme and the World Meteorological Organization… the IPCC is a major reason energy costs [were] rising [prior to the very recent  natural gas revolution ] and  carbon dioxide  is seen as a  pollutant .  Since IPCC’s inception, six reports have been generated, and a Nobel Peace Prize granted to, in equal parts, the IPCC [itself] and Al Gore [the self-proclaimed ‘inventor’ of the Internet]…  Two things are especially important to note about the IPCC. First, its stated objective of “understanding” the scientific basis of human-induced climate change assumes that human-induced climate change is real and that there exists some scientific basis supporting it.  Both are  debatable , but to question either is to set oneself at odds with the IPCC’s very reason for existence.  Second, the qualifier, ‘intergovernmental’, is important.  The IPCC is a panel born of, driven by, and beholden to politics, not science.  The IPCC does not ask science academies to nominate experts in their fields and then fill positions from there.  Nominations are sought from governments, which means that the political philosophy wielding power in participating governments influences (if not controls) IPCC personnel.  Former chairman Rajendra K. Pachauri explicitly confirmed this in 2013: ‘We are an intergovernmental body and we do what the governments of the world want us to do… [We are] at their beck and call.‘  So what we have with the IPCC is an authority-laundering outfit, functioning under the guise of science as an objective advisor to governments when it is in fact appointed by and subject to those governments.  This undermines legitimate science and, to the extent that the panel deigns to dictate from on high how the rest of the world should live, constitutes attempted tyranny.



A scathing new expose on the U.N.’s Intergovernmental Panel of Climate Change — which sets the world’s agenda when it comes to the current state of the climate — claims that its reports have often been written by graduate students with little or no experience in their field of study and whose efforts normally might be barely enough to satisfy grad school requirements.



Leaked UN [IPCC] climate report slammed for citing WWF, Greenpeace



The data document a strong urban heat island effect… a global warming of [only] 0.58°C [about 1/2 what the U.N. IPPC claims][and a]bout a quarter of all the records for the 100-year period show a fall in temperatures.”



[U.N.] IPCC’s Prediction That CO2 Will Cause High Temperatures Found Wildly Wrong, Scientists Confirm



Prominent Chinese Climate Scientists Conclude IPCC Is Worthless: “restricted by its political tendencies”



IPCC’s Claim That Antarctica’s Ice Sheets Are Melting Due To Global Warming Is Found To Be Fraudulent



EPA Blames Increasing Texas Precipitation On Global Warming, While The IPCC Blames Decreasing Texas Precipitation On Global Warming


[Speaking of the EPA (even though this section is really devoted to the IPCC)…]

EPA Glacier Fraud



Fritz Vahrenholt, one of the fathers of the green movement, no longer trusts the forecasts of the IPCC.”



The people who did the IPCC reports were essentially crooks.


[Dr. Singer, for those who don’t know, is an emeritus professor of Physics and Environmental Science at the University of Virginia.]


The Fictive World of Rajendra Pachauri



Medieval warming WAS global – new science contradicts IPCC



Former hero of the German environmental movement: “we have been misguided by the IPCC about the natural fluctuations in the climate in the past thousands of years



The IPCC 1990 FAR predictions were wrong



Pagan Cult Member Turns IPCC Lead Author



Michael Mann:

Hockey Stick Was Refuted Before Its Fabrication – Study Ignored – IPCC And Mann Took [Liberals] On 10-Year Joyride



Michael Mann – never fully investigated, thus never exonerated


[Some people, though — whom Mann despises for exposing his repeated scientific frauds, have been exonerated.  Yes, in courts of law.]

The D.C. superior court granted National Review’s motion to dismiss climate scientist Michael Mann’s long-running defamation suit.


… &

Michael Mann, creator of the infamous global warming ‘hockey stick,’ loses lawsuit against climate skeptic, ordered to pay defendant’s costs



UN Climate Scientists Plead for Immunity from Criminal Prosecution



New paper finds global warming over past century was only about half of IPCC claims



EU Research Confirms Major Fault In IPCC [Climate] Models



IPCC’s Model Prediction Of Extreme Precipitation Events Found To Be Wrong



IPCC Lead Author Misleads US Congress



Soil Moisture Illustrates Why IPCC Computer Models Fail



Climate modeling failure continues to be the dominant symptom of the current institutionalized climate science – unfortunately, it now appears the IPCC’s past climate / temperature prediction fiascoes will continue in the 2013 report.



Errors And Omissions In Major Tropical Climate Mechanism Invalidate IPCC Computer Models



Settled science update: New paper finds aerosols cause 24 times more cooling than estimated by the IPCC



New paper questions usefulness of core IPCC radiative forcing concept



New paper finds potential glacier contribution to sea levels is 43% less than IPCC claims



In 1990, Martin Parry, a future cochair of an IPCC working group, produced a report claiming that the world could suffer mass starvation and soaring food prices within 40 years. Yet the prevalence of undernourishment in developing countries has been on a downward trend since the 1970s and was nearly halved, from 23.3% in 1991 to 12.9% in 2015.




Want to Leave a Reply?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s