Global Warming Consensus

Please report broken hyperlinks using the Reply option at the bottom of each page.

—

[ASND reminds readers that any claim of “consensus” — whether scientific, legal, political, or otherwise — is not and cannot ever be a claim of truth. Such a claim is patently and provably false because it commits the informal logical fallacy of appeal to a majority . Majorities cannot ever define truth simply because they are majorities. Only verifiable evidence — interpreted under the rubric of logic (irrespective of the number of people who are willing or able to acknowledge its veracity) — can and does define truth.]

——————

Scientific Dissent From CO2-Based AGW:

More Than 1000 International Scientists Dissent Over Man-Made Global Warming Claims

[And that was back in 2010.]

https://www.climatedepot.com/2010/12/08/special-report-more-than-1000-international-scientists-dissent-over-manmade-global-warming-claims-challenge-un-ipcc-gore-2/

[“AGW“, btw, is the commonly used acronym for Anthropogenic Global Warming.]

and…

This petition has been signed by over 31,000 American scientists

http://www.petitionproject.org/

[ASND lists that second citation below the first — despite its significantly higher number of signatories, just among American scientists — because most of the signatories to that petition are not climate scientists (as most of the signatories in the previous citation are).]

——————

“No study — whether a survey of published articles or a survey directly of scientists — has found anything remotely near a 97% consensus not only that the earth has warmed and that human activity has contributed significantly but also that human activity has been the primary driver, that the warming caused by it is dangerous, and that attempting to prevent future warming by reducing CO2 emissions would do more good than harm—and those are the issues debated.”

https://cornwallalliance.org/2017/06/whats-wrong-with-the-claim-that-97-of-climate-scientists-agree-about-global-warming/

and…

2019 survey finds majority of earth scientists are global warming doubters

http://www.thetribunepapers.com/2019/03/07/survey-finds-majority-of-scientists-are-global-warming-doubters/

——————

The 97% ‘consensus’ lie

http://judithcurry.com/2013/07/26/the-97-consensus/
&
http://judithcurry.com/2013/07/27/the-97-consensus-part-ii/

and…

The Cynical Myth of a Global Warming “Consensus”

https://www.tfp.org/the-cynical-myth-of-a-global-warming-consensus/

and…

Debunking the 97% ‘consensus’ on global warming

http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2014/02/debunking_the_97_consensus_on_global_warming.html

and…

Global Warming Consensus Crumbling

http://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2013/12/06/global-warming-consensus-crumbling/

——————

Manufacturing(?) consensus

http://judithcurry.com/2011/07/16/manufacturing-consensus/

——————

Scientists Split on Human Impact on Climate Change

http://freebeacon.com/issues/scientists-split-on-human-impact-on-climate-change/

——————

Climate change: no consensus on consensus

http://judithcurry.com/2012/10/28/climate-change-no-consensus-on-consensus/

——————

Global Warming: A 98% Consensus Of Nothing

http://www.forbes.com/sites/jamestaylor/2011/09/08/global-warming-a-98-consensus-of-nothing/

——————

No consensus among climate scientists after all

http://www.theaustralian.com.au/news/opinion/no-consensus-among-climate-scientists-after-all/story-e6frg6zo-1225938383591

——————

The 97% “Consensus” is only 75 Self-Selected Climatologists

http://hockeyschtick.blogspot.com/2010/08/97-consensus-is-only-76-self-selected.html

——————

The IPCC consensus on climate change was phoney, says IPCC insider

http://fullcomment.nationalpost.com/2010/06/13/the-ipcc-consensus-on-climate-change-was-phoney-says-ipcc-insider/

——————

Climate Scientist Survey Reveals A Significant Non-Consensus

http://www.c3headlines.com/2010/09/climate-science-disruption-climate-scientist-survey-reveals-a-significant-non-consensus.html

——————

Nature publishes a well-written piece attacking the idea of “consensus” reports

http://tomnelson.blogspot.com/2011/10/times-they-are-changing-now-nature.html

——————

“There is no scientific consensus on climate change.”

http://heartland.org/policy-documents/lawrence-solomon-numbers-racket

——————

The 97% consensus myth – busted by a real survey

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/11/20/the-97-consensus-myth-busted-by-a-real-survey/

——————

63% of TV Weathercasters Believe Global Warming is Mostly Natural

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/03/29/ams-sponsored-survey-of-tv-weathercasters-63-of-tv-weathercasters-believe-global-warming-is-mostly-natural/

and…

63 Percent Chance Weather Predictors Are Skeptics on Global Warming

http://finance.townhall.com/columnists/johnransom/2013/11/25/meteorologists-bail-on-global-warming-n1752592/print

——————

“A major peer-reviewed paper by four senior researchers has exposed grave errors in an earlier paper in a new and unknown journal that had claimed a 97.1% scientific consensus that Man had caused at least half the 0.7 Cº global warming since 1950.”

https://wattsupwiththat.com/2013/09/03/cooks-97-consensus-disproven-by-a-new-paper-showing-major-math-errors/

——————

Is ‘global cooling’ the new scientific consensus?

http://dailycaller.com/2013/11/01/is-global-cooling-the-new-scientific-consensus/?print=1

——————

Cook Scrapes The Barrel To Get His 97%

http://notalotofpeopleknowthat.wordpress.com/2013/07/29/who-are-the-97/

and…

Warmist ‘consensus’ found to be just a PR campaign: Climategater admits Cook paper ‘a damp squib’

http://junkscience.com/2013/09/13/warmist-consensus-found-to-be-just-a-pr-campaign-climategater-admits-cook-paper-a-damp-squib/

and…

Study: Claimed warmist consensus of 97.1% actually only 0.3%!