Please report broken hyperlinks using the Reply option at the bottom of each page.
—“On the whole … archaeological work has unquestionably strengthened confidence in the reliability of the Scriptural record. More than one archaeologist has found his respect for the Bible increased by the experience of excavation in Palestine. Archaeology has in many cases refuted the views of modern critics.”
– Millar Burrows, Ph.D. (Archaeology), Yale University
https://www.bethinking.org/is-the-bible-reliable/archaeology-and-the-historical-reliability-of-the-new-testament—————
Crucifixion nails, Noah’s Ark, and the Jesus Tomb: how should we respond to sensational archaeological claims?
—————
Archaeology and the New Testament
—————
Archaeology and the Historical Reliability of the New Testament
—————
Why Doesn’t Archaeology Corroborate Every Detail of the New Testament Accounts?
http://coldcasechristianity.com/2013/why-doesnt-archeology-corroborate-every-detail-of-the-new-testament-accounts/—————
84 Confirmed Facts in the Last 16 Chapters of the Book of Acts
http://truthbomb.blogspot.com/2012/01/84-confirmed-facts-in-last-16-chapters.html… &
“The only reasonable explanation for [these] details is that Luke was writing a first hand eyewitness account of what he witnessed.”http://humblesmith.wordpress.com/2014/01/03/the-bible-as-history-minor-details-in-the-book-of-acts/
—————The New Testament is Archaeologically Verifiable
http://pleaseconvinceme.com/2012/the-new-testament-is-archaeologically-verifiable/—————
An ancient ossuary containing the earliest-known reference to Jesus Christ will soon go on display in Israelhttp://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/dec/25/burial-box-earliest-reference-jesus
—————