Please report broken hyperlinks using the Reply option at the bottom of each page.

The driver… took a lot of persuading to climb out of his cab and back up the truck.”

That guy was “lucky?”

What is “luck?”

Some people  think they know what “luck” is but their attempts at definition fail when they attribute chance ” as the cause ofluck.”   Chance , though, is  not a thing  since it occupies no time, space or personality.  Chance , therefore,  cannot   cause anything  — including “luck.”

Others  don’t claim to know whatluck” is but insist thatluck” is – at least for some people.  But if “luck” exists as an actual thing then it must exist objectively, i.e. it must be observable by everyone possessing and using whatever sensing system can observe and/or measure “luck.”

Since “luck,” though, can only be perceived subjectively – like feelings and opinions – then “luck” cannot be a thing.  “Luck” occupies nothing but perception or thought, which are only things to the person(s) doing the perceiving and/or thinking.  “Luck,” then, is not a thing.  If “luck” is not a thing, then “luck” is nothing.

Anyone with objective evidence challenging this logic is invited to make their case to the contrary.

Good “luck.”



Want to Leave a Reply?

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s