Memeland 2-6-23

Ready, Set, gObiden (as in Beavis) memes. That’s all that Memeland will have this Post.

And he wants to force all taxpayers (whether they are Christians or not) to fund all abortions.

Speaking of Beavis’ obsession with the death of innocents…

Beavis not only wants to reinstate the useless “assault weapons” ban (which, again, is a lie since actual assault weapons [i.e. automatic rifles] have always been banned; the rifles Beavis wants to re-ban now are semi-automatic) he wants the innocent, law-abiding owners of these weapons to no longer be able to defend themselves against criminals who will always have such weapons regardless of what laws exist.

Speaking of Beavis’ (and his cronies’) never ending parade of lies, the next couple dozen (actually more) citations (and memes) will deal — directly or indirectly — with Beavis Obiden’s mendacity pathology.

&…

Of course, the reality is that Putin united Europe (against his mass-murderous invasion of Ukraine) while most of Asia — after watching what Beavis did in Afghanistan (part of Asia) — had already started walking away from the promise-breaking U.S. before Putin started murdering tens of thousands of innocent Ukrainians. India, btw, is among those Asian countries who are switching their alliance to Russia and Iran (not so much China due to their border disputes). And Japan is only increasing their defenses because they, too, have had territorial disputes with China for centuries.

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

Yeah, you knew the Chinese spy balloon issue was coming. It had to be. It has completely dominated the news (and therefore also the Internet memes) for several consecutive days. Now the next couple dozen (actually more) citations (and memes) will deal — directly or indirectly — with the balloon, Beavis’ delayed response to it, and what some readers will likely be surprised to see my response is to Beavis’ response.

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

For those who don’t read, that man in a dress is Beavis’ Secretary of State, Antony Blinken.

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

&…

You may have to zoom way into that image to understand why it’s so funny.

&…

&…

If you haven ‘t had children in the last thirty years, that meme will likely fly right over your head.

&…

&…

Boy howdy, ain’t that the truth.

Now, back to the actual issues surrounding the ballon.

First, while persisting in his willful, anti-Christ-ian ignorance about right vs. wrong in Ukraine (he has completely ignored several extensively researched references I have shared with him) Charlie Kirk (who started off this whole balloon section above) is correct about Beavis’ “total fraud” regarding his claims to transparency.

Beavis has intentionally told Mayorkas (DHS Secretary) to continue to allow those drone flights.

&…

For those who don’t read, most of those missiles are hypersonic, developed years ago during Obama’s 8 years of profound idiocy, from which Beavis learned quite well (btw, hypersonic technology was mostly ignored by Donald Trump as well). Our own hypersonic missile technology is still only experimental while both China and Russia have had such missiles deployed for many years. Beavis’ “transparent” administration has never discussed anything about this gross defense negligence, though at least his DoD is now, finally, attempting to play catch-up.

Here’s another glaring example of Beavis’ ongoing lie about “transparency” viz-a-viz the balloon.

If it did happen during the Trump years then the Deep State agents within the DoD during the Trump years intentionally prevented their own Commander in Chief from from ever knowing that because all the high ranking national security officials under Trump (except one) claim that Trump’s DoD never reported anything about Chinese balloons to them (Kellogg said the only balloons China sent traversed short, strictly civilian, rather than military, land areas).

Now those Deep State agents (Mattis, Milley, Austin, et al) intentionally help Beavis Obiden lie about his administration’s “transparency.”

&…

No, that is not a meme. It is the congressional hearing where Milley was asked about his admission of treason, to which Kirk referred just above.

&…

Not surprisingly, one of Beavis’ paid liars has floated this trial balloon canard in an attempt to reconcile the obvious contradictions coming out of the Obiden admin’s various mouths.

&…

Notice what else Beavis’ DoD mouthpieces have intentionally refused to discuss at any of the recent press briefings.

For those who don’t read, an EMP is electromagnetic pulse resulting from a nuclear warhead detonation that — if detonated at high altitude (such as from an intercontinental balloon) — can disable both terrestrial and low-orbiting satellite communications for hundreds of miles in every direction. The residual nuclear particulate matter can also be carried by stratospheric winds many thousands of miles, depositing radioactive poison in varying amounts for the entire length and width of the swath.

That last citation is of particular relevance to the issue of whether and where the balloon should have been shot down, yet it amazes me that virtually no one in the media (including the ostensibly conservative media) understands this relevance. We did not know what was onboard that balloon last week and we didn’t know until just today that it actually was CARRYING AN EXPLOSIVE PAYLOAD.

The previous citation (about EMPs) discussed at painful length the catastrophic consequences of detonating a nuclear explosive at altitude. But WE DID NOT KNOW IF IT HAD A NUCLEAR EXPLOSIVE ABOARD until after we shot it down (more about that below). Yet professing “conservatives” are climbing all over themselves to appear as conservative as they can by ridiculing Beavis and his DoD underlings for NOT DETONATING A DEVICE WHOSE PAYLOAD WE DID NOT KNOW. What the…? What is wrong with these people? If that balloon had carried a nuclear explosive and we detonated it ourselves, then WE WOULD HAVE CAUSED OUR OWN EMP CATASTROPHE ! Ladies and gentlemen, that is exactly the kind of devastation which libertarians have been screaming and yelling about for a year regarding us provoking something similar in Ukraine by RESPONDING — with weapons and training only (no combat personnel on the ground) — to Putin’s mass murder and invasion of a sovereign nation. Yet they are lined up to scream at actual conservatives for exercising the actual restraint that defines true conservatism.

The point here should be obvious: Given what we know about EMPs, there was no good reason to detonate an explosive-laden spy balloon when we could both observe and electronically disable it (which we are told we did) prior to destroying it over water where no one below could be injured. THAT was the conservative (i.e. prudent, thoughtful, life-preserving, etc.) course of action to take once the balloon entered U.S. and/or Canadian air space (though it never should have been allowed to do that) and I, for one (conservative), am surprised and impressed that mostly brainless Beavis Obiden managed to grasp that reality (thanks, apparently, to the few conservatives who remain in Beavis’ now-radically left wing DoD). Credit where it is due, regardless of who has earned it, and regardless of how many “conservatives” object to it. The truth is the truth, and I will share more of it below.

Regarding the aforementioned “electronic disabling” of the balloon, it’s no secret that our military (including the Air Force) have extensive and highly advanced electronic jamming capabilities, essentially capable of disabling whatever instruments were listening and/or observing onboard the balloon.

I suspect the Air Force employed those tools way back early last week when the balloon was traversing the North Pacific near the Aleutian Islands (part of Alaska, where we also have extensive military positions and capabilities — and this is where the balloon should have been shot down, over water, like it eventually was almost a week later), which likely rendered the balloon’s spy capabilities completely or at least mostly useless. I do not speak from ignorance on this subject. I happen to have an advanced degree in Geographic Techniques (a.k.a. mapping science) and part of that degree included advanced studies in Remote Sensing (i.e. the use of electronic technology to observe and record information about objects with which we cannot make direct contact). I also possessed a security clearance for ten years and worked in a classified capacity — with some necessary awareness of what our remote sensing and jamming capabilities are (or were at the time, about a decade ago) — for some of those years. So it makes sense to me that, knowing we had disabled the balloon’s spyware (because I know that we could have), the only thing we didn’t know was its nuclear (i.e. EMP) lethality. Therefore it also makes sense that we monitored the balloon (with our own listening and observing technologies — i.e. spying on the spy) for the remainder of its obvious espionage-inspired mission. And yes, destroying it over land — even without any nuclear payload — could have damaged or destroyed life and/or property when it came down, so that strategy, too, made sense.

Now, regarding the instruments onboard the balloon, here’s where I am perplexed (feel free to leave a Reply at the bottom of the Post if you know how to resolve this logical canundrom). The DoD reps have all said that they intend to retrieve as much of the balloon’s payload as they can, which also supports the sensibility of waiting to demobilize the craft until it passed back over the ocean since impact with water does far less damage to instruments than impact with hard ground. But why, then, did the Air Force fire an explosive missile at the instruments rather than at the balloon? Look at the imagery.

The video is more descriptive but these two sequential stills also show (with less clarity) that the missile struck the payload containment pod below the balloon rather than the balloon itself. That was no accident and it could have been targeted differently using a laser-guided (rather than radar-guided) missile. Clearly, then, the balloon’s instruments were considered expendable since the Air Force intentionally destroyed them (or, at the very least targeted them) rather than attempting to preserve them. What was up with that? The DoD have said they can reassemble “most” of the destroyed instruments but they will *never* be able to restart and/or operate them. That’s just a fact and that’s the only part of this entire story that doesn’t make sense.

Not surprisingly, Beavis’ buttheads have fallen dutifully and in perfect lockstep line behind their fearful leader.

BTW, I just learned this last week. How many of you know what the word “Schumer” means in German?

And, since we had to bring up the Germans…

… but we digress.

This whole passion play (complete with the death of the lead actor — a balloon) is really just an elaborate test run for something I have been saying here in Memeland — almost every week — ever since I created it.

This, folks, is the whole point, the bottom line, and exactly what I’ve been saying for many months.

&…

Obviously, Xi also knows we are “strained” in terms of munitions and equipment supplies (that is something Congress could change THIS WEEK if they were willing) and Xi is therefore obviously taking advantage of that situation to gauge our willingness and capabilities to respond to threats. Since we didn’t bring the balloon down over the north Pacific (preferably by preserving the onboard instruments), we were forced to delay our response until the balloon reached the western Atlantic, where we are currently attempting to salvage a destroyed set of instruments (which, btw, the Chinese planned on doing themselves since they had apparently loaded explosives into the same pod with the spyware). Thinking people understand why the delay was required AFTER the balloon began to traverse North America but thinking people also understand that the DoD was grossly delinquent in not taking the balloon down without damaging the instruments when they easily could have off the coast of Alaska.

&…

So China IS planning to face us in a war IF we don’t make it clear to Xi that it will cost him EVERYTHING if he tries to invade and remove our access to the source of our fastest and militarily essential microprocessors — a.k.a. Taiwan. Clearly Beavis didn’t do that last week with the balloon saga (as I said, the balloon should have been shot down over the north Pacific), but because Xi is Xi, Beavis will be given more opportunities to prove either his mettle or his mental deficiency. Some of the things we should have been doing for years — including the Trump years — include…